Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implication in regenerative programming" » "based implication in generative programming" (Expand search), "based implication in declarative programming" (Expand search), "based implication in imperative programming" (Expand search), "based application in regenerative programming" (Expand search), "based replication in regenerative programming" (Expand search), "based aplication in regenerative programming" (Expand search), "based implication and regenerative programming" (Expand search), "based implication skin regeneration programming" (Expand search), "based implication in neurodegenerative programming" (Expand search), "based implications in regenerative programming" (Expand search), "based implications on regenerative programming" (Expand search), "based implication of regenerative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implication in regenerative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implication in regenerative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implication in regenerative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.