Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based implication in compromised programming" » "based implication in compromise programming" (Expand search), "based application in compromised programming" (Expand search), "based replication in compromised programming" (Expand search), "based aplication in compromised programming" (Expand search), "based implications in compromised programming" (Expand search), "based implications on compromised programming" (Expand search), "based implication of compromised programming" (Expand search), "based implication and compromised programming" (Expand search), "based implication _ compromised programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based implication in compromised programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based implication in compromised programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based implication in compromised programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based implication in compromised programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.