Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based formulation using reactive programming" » "based formulation using objective programming" (Expand search), "based formulation using teaching programming" (Expand search), "based formulation using declarative programming" (Expand search), "based formulations using reactive programming" (Expand search), "based simulation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "and formulation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "based formation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "based formulation using reductive programming" (Expand search), "based formulation during reactive programming" (Expand search), "based formulation using active programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based formulation using reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based formulation using reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based formulation using reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.