Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based convolutional coding coverage on" » "based convolutional codes coverage on" (Expand search), "based convolutional code coverage on" (Expand search), "based convolutional long coverage on" (Expand search), "and convolutional coding coverage on" (Expand search), "deep convolutional coding coverage on" (Expand search), "3d convolutional coding coverage on" (Expand search), "based convolutional fading coverage on" (Expand search), "based convolutional funding coverage on" (Expand search), "based convolutional coding coverage of" (Expand search), "based convolutional coding coverage in" (Expand search), "based convolutional coding coverage and" (Expand search)
"using in python python programming" » "using in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using in piton python programming" (Expand search), "using in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based convolutional coding coverage on\") OR (\"using in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based convolutional coding coverage on ) OR ( using in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based convolutional coding coverage on") OR ("using in python python programming"))*.