Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based convolutional code coverage in" » "and convolutional code coverage in" (Expand search), "deep convolutional code coverage in" (Expand search), "3d convolutional code coverage in" (Expand search), "based convolutional codes coverage in" (Expand search), "based convolutional and coverage in" (Expand search), "based convolucional cnn coverage in" (Expand search), "based convolutional care coverage in" (Expand search), "based convolutional the coverage in" (Expand search), "based convolutional code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based convolutional code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based convolutional code coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based convolutional code coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based convolutional code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.