Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computationally efficient coverage in" » "based computational efficiency coverage in" (Expand search), "based computational efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "made computationally efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "base computacional efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "based computationally efficient overall in" (Expand search), "based computationally efficient concrete in" (Expand search), "based computationally efficient storage in" (Expand search), "based computationally efficient coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computationally efficient coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computationally efficient coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based computationally efficient coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.