Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computational time fragment programming" » "based computational time agent programming" (Expand search), "based computational time driven programming" (Expand search), "based computational time training programming" (Expand search), "and computational time fragment programming" (Expand search), "by computational time fragment programming" (Expand search), "based computational tool fragment programming" (Expand search), "based computational code fragment programming" (Expand search), "based computational tools fragment programming" (Expand search), "based computational the fragment programming" (Expand search), "based computational like fragment programming" (Expand search), "based computational wire fragment programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computational time fragment programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computational time fragment programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based computational time fragment programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.