Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computational features predict coding" » "based compositional features predict coding" (Expand search), "based computational resources predict coding" (Expand search), "based computational softwares predict coding" (Expand search), "and computational features predict coding" (Expand search), "by computational features predict coding" (Expand search), "based computational measures predict coding" (Expand search), "based computational feature predictor coding" (Expand search), "based computational features reduce coding" (Expand search), "based computational features predict coping" (Expand search), "based computational features predictive coding" (Expand search), "based computational features prediction coding" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based computational features predict coding") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computational features predict coding\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computational features predict coding ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.