Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computational feature extraction coding" » "based computational features extraction coding" (Expand search), "based compositional features extraction coding" (Expand search), "based rotational feature extraction coding" (Expand search), "and computational feature extraction coding" (Expand search), "by computational feature extraction coding" (Expand search), "based computational feature extraction coating" (Expand search), "based computational feature extraction cooking" (Expand search), "based computational feature extraction aiding" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based computational feature extraction coding") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computational feature extraction coding\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computational feature extraction coding ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.