Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computational efficient coverage in" » "based computationally efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "based computational efficiency coverage in" (Expand search), "based computacional eficiente coverage in" (Expand search), "and computational efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "by computational efficient coverage in" (Expand search), "based computational efficient overall in" (Expand search), "based computational efficient concrete in" (Expand search), "based computational efficient storage in" (Expand search), "based computational efficient coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based computational efficient coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computational efficient coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computational efficient coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.