Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computation using predictive post" » "based computational using predictive post" (Expand search), "based competition using predictive post" (Expand search), "based compilation using predictive post" (Expand search), "based computations using predictive post" (Expand search), "based computation in predictive post" (Expand search), "based composition using predictive post" (Expand search), "based computation and predictive post" (Expand search), "based computation using predicting post" (Expand search), "based computation using predictive power" (Expand search), "based computation using predict post" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based computation using predictive post") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computation using predictive post\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computation using predictive post ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.