Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computation reuse coverage on" » "based computational reuse coverage on" (Expand search), "based competition reuse coverage on" (Expand search), "based compilation reuse coverage on" (Expand search), "based computation nets coverage on" (Expand search), "based computation tree coverage on" (Expand search), "based computation the coverage on" (Expand search), "based computation rule coverage on" (Expand search), "based computation cusp coverage on" (Expand search), "based computation tube coverage on" (Expand search), "based computation reuse coverage of" (Expand search), "based computation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "based computation reuse coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based computation reuse coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computation reuse coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computation reuse coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.