Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based computation in octave programming" » "based computation in stage programming" (Expand search), "based computation in objective programming" (Expand search), "based computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "based computational in octave programming" (Expand search), "based competition in octave programming" (Expand search), "based compilation in octave programming" (Expand search), "based computation and octave programming" (Expand search), "based computation of octave programming" (Expand search), "based imputation in octave programming" (Expand search), "based computation gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "based computation n octane programming" (Expand search), "based computation _ octave programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based computation in octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based computation in octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("based computation in octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.