Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based compositional code coverage in" » "base compositional code coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositions code coverage in" (Expand search), "varied compositional code coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositional model coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositional zone coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositional models coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositional care coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositional and coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositional the coverage in" (Expand search), "based compositional code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based compositional code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based compositional code coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based compositional code coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.