Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"based allocation in routine programming" » "based allocation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "based allocation in cone programming" (Expand search), "based allocation in line programming" (Expand search), "based location in routine programming" (Expand search), "based application in routine programming" (Expand search), "based association in routine programming" (Expand search), "based allocation of routine programming" (Expand search), "based allocation _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("based allocation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"based allocation in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( based allocation in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.