Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"bad computation in adaptive programming" » "bad computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "bad computation in adaptive programs" (Expand search), "bad computation in objective programming" (Expand search), "based computation in adaptive programming" (Expand search), "and computation in adaptive programming" (Expand search), "map computation in adaptive programming" (Expand search), "bad computation and adaptive programming" (Expand search), "bad computation of adaptive programming" (Expand search), "bad imputation in adaptive programming" (Expand search), "bad computation an adaptive programming" (Expand search), "bad computation on adaptive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"bad computation in adaptive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( bad computation in adaptive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("bad computation in adaptive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.