Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"bad computation in active programming" » "bad computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "bad computation in octave programming" (Expand search), "bad computation in adaptive programming" (Expand search), "based computation in active programming" (Expand search), "and computation in active programming" (Expand search), "map computation in active programming" (Expand search), "bad computation and active programming" (Expand search), "bad computation of active programming" (Expand search), "bad imputation in active programming" (Expand search), "bad computation an active programming" (Expand search), "bad computation in action programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("bad computation in active programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"bad computation in active programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( bad computation in active programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.