Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"applying computational in octave programming" » "using computational in octave programming" (Expand search), "applying computational in stage programming" (Expand search), "applying computational in objective programming" (Expand search), "applying computational in reactive programming" (Expand search), "applying computational and octave programming" (Expand search), "applying computational _ octave programming" (Expand search), "applying computational 3d octave programming" (Expand search), "applying computational gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "applying computational n octane programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"applying computational in octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( applying computational in octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("applying computational in octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.