Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and regression using convolutional code" » "and regression using convolutional codes" (Expand search), "and regression using convolutional and" (Expand search), "and regression using convolucional cnn" (Expand search), "and regression testing convolutional code" (Expand search), "and regression in convolutional code" (Expand search), "and expression using convolutional code" (Expand search), "random regression using convolutional code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and regression using convolutional code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and regression using convolutional code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and regression using convolutional code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.