Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and implication in routine programming" » "and implication in reactive programming" (Expand search), "and implication in cone programming" (Expand search), "and implication in line programming" (Expand search), "and implications in routine programming" (Expand search), "and application in routine programming" (Expand search), "and replication in routine programming" (Expand search), "and implications on routine programming" (Expand search), "and implication of routine programming" (Expand search), "and implication _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and implication in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and implication in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and implication in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and implication in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.