Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and implementation in set programming" » "and implementation and set programming" (Expand search), "and implementation of set programming" (Expand search), "and implementation in based programming" (Expand search), "and implementation in agent programming" (Expand search), "and implementation in _ programming" (Expand search), "and implementation in sete programming" (Expand search), "and implementation in sea programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and implementation in set programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and implementation in set programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and implementation in set programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.