Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using implication in agile programming" » "using implications in agile programming" (Expand search), "using application in agile programming" (Expand search), "nursing implications in agile programming" (Expand search), "using implication in tangible programming" (Expand search), "using implication in line programming" (Expand search), "using implication in agent programming" (Expand search), "using implications on agile programming" (Expand search), "using implication of agile programming" (Expand search), "using implication in aging programming" (Expand search), "using implication in age programming" (Expand search)
"and functionality in coding program" » "and functional in coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality and coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality of coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cloning program" (Expand search), "and functionality in loading program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cooling programs" (Expand search), "and functionality on coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in decoding program" (Expand search), "and functionality non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionality in coding program\") OR (\"using implication in agile programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionality in coding program ) OR ( using implication in agile programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and functionality in coding program") OR ("using implication in agile programming"))*.