Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using decomposition with fragile programming" » "during decomposition with fragile programming" (Expand search), "gini decomposition with fragile programming" (Expand search), "building decomposition with fragile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition with agile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition with tangible programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition with fragment programming" (Expand search), "using decompositions with fragile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition white fragile programming" (Expand search), "using composition with fragile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition with fragility programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition with forage programming" (Expand search)
"and functionality in coding program" » "and functional in coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality and coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality of coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cloning program" (Expand search), "and functionality in loading program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cooling programs" (Expand search), "and functionality on coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in decoding program" (Expand search), "and functionality non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and functionality in coding program") OR ("using decomposition with fragile programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionality in coding program\") OR (\"using decomposition with fragile programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionality in coding program ) OR ( using decomposition with fragile programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and functionality in coding program") OR ("using decomposition with fragile programming"))*.