Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using decomposition in fragile programming" » "during decomposition in fragile programming" (Expand search), "gini decomposition in fragile programming" (Expand search), "building decomposition in fragile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition in agile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition in tangible programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition in fragment programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition and fragile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition of fragile programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition in frail programming" (Expand search), "using decomposition _ fragile programming" (Expand search)
"and functionality in coding program" » "and functional in coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality and coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality of coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cloning program" (Expand search), "and functionality in loading program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cooling programs" (Expand search), "and functionality on coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in decoding program" (Expand search), "and functionality non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and functionality in coding program") OR ("using decomposition in fragile programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionality in coding program\") OR (\"using decomposition in fragile programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionality in coding program ) OR ( using decomposition in fragile programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and functionality in coding program") OR ("using decomposition in fragile programming"))*.