Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using complication with fragile programming" » "using complication with agile programming" (Expand search), "using complication with tangible programming" (Expand search), "using complication with fragment programming" (Expand search), "using compilation with fragile programming" (Expand search), "nursing complications with fragile programming" (Expand search), "during complications with fragile programming" (Expand search), "using complications with fragile programming" (Expand search), "using complexation with fragile programming" (Expand search), "using communication with fragile programming" (Expand search), "using complication with fragility programming" (Expand search), "using complication with forage programming" (Expand search)
"and functionality in coding program" » "and functional in coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality and coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality of coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cloning program" (Expand search), "and functionality in loading program" (Expand search), "and functionality in cooling programs" (Expand search), "and functionality on coding program" (Expand search), "and functionality in decoding program" (Expand search), "and functionality non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and functionality in coding program") OR ("using complication with fragile programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionality in coding program\") OR (\"using complication with fragile programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionality in coding program ) OR ( using complication with fragile programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and functionality in coding program") OR ("using complication with fragile programming"))*.