Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and functionality by reactive programming" » "and functionality by objective programming" (Expand search), "and functionality by teaching programming" (Expand search), "and functionality by declarative programming" (Expand search), "and functional by reactive programming" (Expand search), "and functionality nbr reactive programming" (Expand search), "and functionality of reactive programming" (Expand search), "and functionality in reactive programming" (Expand search), "and functionality c reactive programming" (Expand search), "and functionality and reactive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionality by reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionality by reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and functionality by reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.