Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and functionalities using coverage and" » "and functionalities in coverage and" (Expand search), "and functionalities spin coverage and" (Expand search), "and functionalization using coverage and" (Expand search), "and functionality using coverage and" (Expand search), "and functionalism using coverage and" (Expand search), "and functionalities using average and" (Expand search), "and functionalities testing coverage and" (Expand search), "and functionalities funding coverage and" (Expand search), "and functionalities using coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalities using coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and functionalities using coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionalities using coverage and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionalities using coverage and ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.