Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and functionalities in coverage from" » "and functionality in coverage from" (Expand search), "and functionalization in coverage from" (Expand search), "and functionalism in coverage from" (Expand search), "and functionalities of coverage from" (Expand search), "and functionals in coverage from" (Expand search), "and functionalities in beverage from" (Expand search), "and functionalities in coverage of" (Expand search), "and functionalities in coverage on" (Expand search), "and functionalities and coverage from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and functionalities in coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionalities in coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionalities in coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.