Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and functionalities code coverage in" » "and functionalities of coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalities and coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalities to coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionality code coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalization code coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalism code coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalities care coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalities the coverage in" (Expand search), "and functionalities code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and functionalities code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and functionalities code coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and functionalities code coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and functionalities code coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.