Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and computational in repetitive programming" » "and computational in competitive programming" (Expand search), "and computational in reactive programming" (Expand search), "and computational in generative programming" (Expand search), "_ computational in repetitive programming" (Expand search), "and computational and repetitive programming" (Expand search), "and computational _ repetitive programming" (Expand search), "and computational 3d repetitive programming" (Expand search), "and computational on repetitive programming" (Expand search), "and computational non repetitive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and computational in repetitive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and computational in repetitive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and computational in repetitive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.