Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and computational efficient using programming" » "and computationally efficient using programming" (Expand search), "and computational efficiency using programming" (Expand search), "and computacional eficiente using programming" (Expand search), "_ computational efficient using programming" (Expand search), "and computational efficient during programming" (Expand search), "and computational efficient single programming" (Expand search), "and computational efficient ranking programming" (Expand search), "and computational coefficient using programming" (Expand search), "and computational efficient tuning programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and computational efficient using programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and computational efficient using programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and computational efficient using programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.