Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and computational efficiency computation code" » "and operational efficiency computation code" (Expand search), "and computational neuroscience computation code" (Expand search), "and nutritional efficiency computation code" (Expand search), "and computational efficiency computational code" (Expand search), "and computational efficient computation code" (Expand search), "and computational eficiency computations code" (Expand search), "_ computational efficiency computation code" (Expand search), "and computational efficiency computation model" (Expand search), "and computational efficiency computation co" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and computational efficiency computation code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and computational efficiency computation code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and computational efficiency computation code ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.