Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and computational effective robot programming" » "and computational effect robot programming" (Expand search), "and computational perspective robot programming" (Expand search), "and computational reflection robot programming" (Expand search), "_ computational effective robot programming" (Expand search), "and computational effective robots programming" (Expand search), "and computational effective goal programming" (Expand search), "and computational effective cone programming" (Expand search), "and computational effective root programming" (Expand search), "and computational effective role programming" (Expand search), "and computational effective route programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and computational effective robot programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and computational effective robot programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and computational effective robot programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.