Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and computation using negative processes" » "and computation using integrative processes" (Expand search), "and computation using generative processes" (Expand search), "and computation using narrative processes" (Expand search), "and computations using negative processes" (Expand search), "and computation in negative processes" (Expand search), "and composition using negative processes" (Expand search), "and computational using negative processes" (Expand search), "of computation using negative processes" (Expand search), "and computation using native processes" (Expand search), "and computation using relative processes" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and computation using negative processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and computation using negative processes\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and computation using negative processes ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("and computation using negative processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.