Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"and computation using defective programming" » "and computation using objective programming" (Expand search), "and computation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "and computation using selective reprogramming" (Expand search), "and computations using defective programming" (Expand search), "and computation in defective programming" (Expand search), "and composition using defective programming" (Expand search), "and computational using defective programming" (Expand search), "of computation using defective programming" (Expand search), "and computation causing defective programming" (Expand search), "and computation using selective programming" (Expand search), "and computation using effective programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("and computation using defective programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"and computation using defective programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( and computation using defective programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.