Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"advanced function with coverage and" » "advanced functions with coverage and" (Expand search), "advanced glycation with coverage and" (Expand search), "advance injunction with coverage and" (Expand search), "advanced conjunction with coverage and" (Expand search), "advanced function with average and" (Expand search), "advanced function with cover and" (Expand search), "advanced function in coverage and" (Expand search), "advanced function with coverage in" (Expand search), "advanced function with coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("advanced function with coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"advanced function with coverage and\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( advanced function with coverage and ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("advanced function with coverage and") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.