Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"advanced communications using reactive programming" » "and communications using reactive programming" (Expand search), "brand communications using reactive programming" (Expand search), "broadband communications using reactive programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications in reactive programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications and reactive programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications plan reactive programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications using objective programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications using teaching programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications using declarative programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications using reductive programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications during reactive programming" (Expand search), "advanced communications using active programming" (Expand search)
"using code from python programming" » "using code from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "using code from anthony programming" (Expand search), "using cone from python programming" (Expand search), "using co from python programming" (Expand search), "using co2 from python programming" (Expand search), "using code form python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("advanced communications using reactive programming") OR ("using code from python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"advanced communications using reactive programming\") OR (\"using code from python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( advanced communications using reactive programming ) OR ( using code from python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("advanced communications using reactive programming") OR ("using code from python programming"))*.