Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"policies implications python python programming" » "policy implications python python programming" (Expand search), "political implications python python programming" (Expand search), "species implications python python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications within python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications toon python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications on python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications pythons python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications piton python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications pitons python programming" (Expand search)
"_ convolutional coding using program" » "_ convolutional codes using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding housing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding nursing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional loading using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional modeling using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional drying using program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ convolutional coding using program") OR ("policies implications python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding using program\") OR (\"policies implications python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding using program ) OR ( policies implications python python programming ))*.