Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding in projections" » "_ convolutional codes in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding in projection" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding on projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding and projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding rna projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding _ projections" (Expand search)
"change implications in python programming" » "care implications in python programming" (Expand search), "the implications in python programming" (Expand search), "change implications _ python programming" (Expand search), "change implications of python programming" (Expand search), "change applications in python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ convolutional coding in projections") OR ("change implications in python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding in projections\") OR (\"change implications in python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding in projections ) OR ( change implications in python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding in projections") OR ("change implications in python programming"))*.