Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding in projections" » "_ convolutional codes in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long in projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding in projection" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding on projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding and projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding rna projections" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding _ projections" (Expand search)
"advanced allocation in python programming" » "advanced application in python programming" (Expand search), "advanced glycation in python programming" (Expand search), "advanced automation in python programming" (Expand search), "advanced allocation of python programming" (Expand search), "advanced allocation _ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding in projections\") OR (\"advanced allocation in python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding in projections ) OR ( advanced allocation in python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding in projections") OR ("advanced allocation in python programming"))*.