Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding in program" » "_ convolutional codes in program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code in program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long in program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding in programs" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding rna program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding and program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding _ program" (Expand search)
"castel implications python python programming" » "case implications python python programming" (Expand search), "waste implications python python programming" (Expand search), "capital implications python python programming" (Expand search), "castel implications within python programming" (Expand search), "castel implications toon python programming" (Expand search), "castel implications on python programming" (Expand search), "castel implications pythons python programming" (Expand search), "castel implications piton python programming" (Expand search), "castel implications pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ convolutional coding in program") OR ("castel implications python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding in program\") OR (\"castel implications python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding in program ) OR ( castel implications python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding in program") OR ("castel implications python python programming"))*.