Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding feeding program" » "_ convolutional codes feeding program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code feeding program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long feeding program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional going feeding program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional grouding feeding program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional feeding feeding program" (Expand search)
"ashamed implications from python programming" » "same implications from python programming" (Expand search), "island implications from python programming" (Expand search), "related implications from python programming" (Expand search), "ashamed implications of python programming" (Expand search), "ashamed implications on python programming" (Expand search), "ashamed implications to python programming" (Expand search), "ashamed implications from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "ashamed implications from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding feeding program\") OR (\"ashamed implications from python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding feeding program ) OR ( ashamed implications from python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding feeding program") OR ("ashamed implications from python programming"))*.