Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding coping program" » "_ convolutional codes coping program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code coping program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long coping program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding cloning program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding computing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding cooling programs" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coping coping program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coping copying program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding decoding program" (Expand search)
"advanced static python python programming" » "advanced stats python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced prostatic python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced hepatic python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced static method python programming" (Expand search), "advanced static pythons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced static piton python programming" (Expand search), "advanced static pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding coping program\") OR (\"advanced static python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding coping program ) OR ( advanced static python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding coping program") OR ("advanced static python python programming"))*.