Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding aging program" » "_ convolutional codes aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding changing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding leasing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding reading program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coating aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding canine program" (Expand search)
"basin implications from python programming" » "spain implications from python programming" (Expand search), "region implications from python programming" (Expand search), "amazon implications from python programming" (Expand search), "basin implications of python programming" (Expand search), "basin implications on python programming" (Expand search), "basin implications to python programming" (Expand search), "basin implications from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "basin implications from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ convolutional coding aging program") OR ("basin implications from python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding aging program\") OR (\"basin implications from python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding aging program ) OR ( basin implications from python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding aging program") OR ("basin implications from python programming"))*.