Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional coding aging program" » "_ convolutional codes aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional long aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding changing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding leasing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding reading program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coating aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding canine program" (Expand search)
"based implications from python programming" » "based applications from python programming" (Expand search), "basin implications from python programming" (Expand search), "case implications from python programming" (Expand search), "based implications of python programming" (Expand search), "based implications on python programming" (Expand search), "based implications to python programming" (Expand search), "based implications from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "based implications from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional coding aging program\") OR (\"based implications from python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional coding aging program ) OR ( based implications from python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional coding aging program") OR ("based implications from python programming"))*.