Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"policies implications python python programming" » "policy implications python python programming" (Expand search), "political implications python python programming" (Expand search), "species implications python python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications within python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications toon python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications on python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications pythons python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications piton python programming" (Expand search), "policies implications pitons python programming" (Expand search)
"_ convolutional code using program" » "_ convolutional codes using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional and using program" (Expand search), "_ convolucional cnn using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code housing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code nursing program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code aging program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional made using program" (Expand search), "_ convolutional coding using program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ convolutional code using program") OR ("policies implications python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional code using program\") OR (\"policies implications python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional code using program ) OR ( policies implications python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional code using program") OR ("policies implications python python programming"))*.