Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ convolutional code planning problem" » "_ convolutional codes planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional and planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolucional cnn planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code packing problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional code planning process" (Expand search), "_ convolutional care planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional dose planning problem" (Expand search), "_ convolutional pose planning problem" (Expand search)
"based implications from python programming" » "based applications from python programming" (Expand search), "basin implications from python programming" (Expand search), "case implications from python programming" (Expand search), "based implications of python programming" (Expand search), "based implications on python programming" (Expand search), "based implications to python programming" (Expand search), "based implications from pathogen programming" (Expand search), "based implications from anthony programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ convolutional code planning problem\") OR (\"based implications from python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ convolutional code planning problem ) OR ( based implications from python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ convolutional code planning problem") OR ("based implications from python programming"))*.