Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations using predictive processes" » "_ computations using productive processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using predictive process" (Expand search), "_ computations using reductive processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using predictive processes" (Expand search), "_ populations using predictive processes" (Expand search), "_ computations in predictive processes" (Expand search), "_ computations and predictive processes" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computations using predictive processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations using predictive processes\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations using predictive processes ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations using predictive processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.