Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations using conductive processes" » "_ computations using conduction processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using convective processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using constructive processes" (Expand search), "_ computation using conductive processes" (Expand search), "_ populations using conductive processes" (Expand search), "_ computations in conductive processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using collective processes" (Expand search), "_ computations using reductive processes" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computations using conductive processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations using conductive processes\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations using conductive processes ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations using conductive processes") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.