Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ computations using conducting wire" » "_ computation using conducting wire" (Expand search), "_ populations using conducting wire" (Expand search), "_ computations in conducting wire" (Expand search), "_ computations using conductive wire" (Expand search), "_ computations using superconducting wire" (Expand search), "_ computations using conducting pre" (Expand search), "_ computations using conducting oxide" (Expand search), "_ computations using conducting the" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("_ computations using conducting wire") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"_ computations using conducting wire\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( _ computations using conducting wire ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("_ computations using conducting wire") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.